| Phil Brady |
North Wales MAN |
| Mick Kahn (Secretary) |
London Metropolitan Network |
| Paul Kentish |
Kentish MAN |
| Ian Griffiths |
EMMAN |
| Tim Robinson |
NetNorthWest |
| Jim Hendry |
MidMAN |
| Mike Byrne |
LeNSE |
| Roger Williams |
WNL |
| Ed Carter |
YHMAN |
| Barry Forde | C&NLMAN |
| Steve Percival |
UKERNA (item 5 onwards) |
Present in Edinburgh:
| George Howat |
EaStMAN |
| Mike Whitehead |
FaTMAN |
| John Linn |
AbMAN |
| Colin Cooper |
ClydeNet |
| Kit Powell |
SWERN |
| Jason Bain |
NorMAN |
| Denis Russell |
UKERNA (item 5 onwards) |
Apologies were received from:
| Dave Vinograd (Convenor) |
|
| Chris Cheney |
EastNet |
| David Hayling |
Kentish MAN |
| Chris Kelley |
NIRAN |
| Linda McCormick |
ClydeNet |
1.1 Accuracy
There were no corrections to the minutes of the previous meeting held on 28 April 2004.
1.2 Annual Report
It was agreed that the annual report on activities of the Regional Networks should be published on the UK MANs web site by the October meeting. Each MAN should send Mick Kahn one or two paragraphs on its activities over the last year.
Action: All, Mick Kahn
The May meeting of the Chairs of MANs Group had been cancelled due to lack of business.
The draft terms of reference were still awaited from the Chairs of MANs Group. UKMMG will agree its revised terms of reference by email to be compatible with the Chairs of MANs Group.
Action: Mick Kahn
Ian Griffiths reported that John Armley from Adit East Midlands would be attending the October UK MANs meeting.
Most English MANs had had some contact with the Adits, but this had varied considerably. In a small number of cases, MAN upgrades (e.g. FE upgrades) were being included in Adit procurement bundles. In other cases it was unclear what benefit involvement with the Adit would bring, given the large loans that the Adits would have to repay. The contractual arrangements for purchasing through Adits were also unclear.
In a number of regions the Adit was exploring how the MAN could be used as a supplier. This was difficult, as MANs had not been considered in the initial supplier selection exercise.
4.1 Connections reliability paper
Mike Whitehead tabled a paper recommending a study on end-to-end dependability for JANET. The general approach of the paper was agreed. A few minor amendments were proposed and further email comments were invited within the next week. Mike Whitehead will produce a revised version for submission to the Chairs of MANs Group and UKERNA within a further week.
Action: Mike Whitehead
It was agreed that the study should be completed by the end of March 2005 so that it could feed into the SuperJANET5 process.
4.2 Development Task Force
Mick Kahn reported that the Development Task Force had held its first meeting, which had been very productive. A process for co-ordinate end to end service development across SuperJANET and the RNs was being developed and an advisory joint steering group to co-ordinate this process will be proposed. The minutes for the first group will be available soon.
4.3 Negotiating team for SuperJANET5 Changes
It was agreed that the team to negotiate the SuperJANET5 changes would be Dave Vinograd, Mike Byrne and Mick Kahn. The team will elect a chair to ensure effective operation.
5.1 Publishing MAN availability figures
Steve Percival reported that the UKERNA Board wished to publish detailed reports on MAN availability that identified individual MANs. The Group had no objections this in principle, though would like clarification in a number of areas. In particular explanatory notes of how the statistics were calculated will be needed and an explanation of any poor figures will need to be added as a note.
It was noted that all the poor figures at present were due to radio and that this was being addressed by replacement technology where possible, funded from the remains of the SuperJANET4 money.
There was a discussion on the mechanism for reconciliation of UKERNA’s figures and the RN’s own figures. The reporting to RNs was not the same across the whole of the UK and Steve Percival will investigate.
Action: Steve Percival
Steve Percival invited further input from the RNs on the reconciliation and reporting of availability figures.
Action: All
5.2 Service availability reporting
Steve Percival reported that UKERNA were reviewing the service availability reporting where there were multiple physical connections to an institution, in response to a request from the RNOs. The principle of reporting would remain the service to the institution taking into account the circuit provision funded by JISC. The improved availability provided by multiple connections should be recognised.
As a first step he had identified four scenarios that needed to be considered.
- multiple 2Mbps links with both end points the same
- back up circuits funded by JISC (e.g. lower bandwidth leased lines to back up a microwave link in SWMAN)
- back up as part of the core infrastructure (e.g. EMMAN)
- multiple sites of an institution connection to a different PoP (e.g. LMN, though only part of the connection funded by JISC)
An additional scenario was identified
- where separate 2Mbps connections are made to the institution and the MAN provides inter site connectivity. The JISC funded site may not be the real main site of the institution.
It was noted that failure of links and service were not the same. There was a need to be clear who the reporting was for. Steve Percival will develop proposals that will cope with these scenarios.
Action: Steve Percival
5.3 Northern Ireland
Steve Percival reported that the Northern Ireland Regional Area Network (NIRAN) had now signed an RPAN agreement with UKERNA and a telecommunications contract and expected the network to be operational in October.
5.4 Visits to RNs
Denis Russell reported that he had visited 5 Regional networks and planning visits to others.
5.5 RN funding in Scotland
Denis Russell reported that the Scottish funding council had asked UKERNA to provide indicative figures for requirements for the backbone, RNs and FE. As a result the visits to the Scottish MANs will be prioritised.
5.6 Fibre rating
It was noted that there was a new contact, Alan Bradford, at the Valuation Office.
Denis Russell had received information from many MANs on the fibre that they lit. He encouraged the others to respond even if the information was incomplete. He will seek independent advice.
The issue was also being discussed by UCNG.
The next two meetings will be held on Wednesday 6 October 2004 in London and Thursday 20 January 2005 in London.
There was no other business.
The following news from MANs was received for inclusion in the minutes.
London Metropolitan Network
The telecommunications contract with Thus has been extended to 31 July 2006.
It is planned to use the LMN development network to provide access to UKLight to Imperial College.
A pilot project for an off site online backup and restore service has been successfully completed in partnership with InTechnology plc (ITO). Both pilot sites, LMN and ITO are all very pleased with the outcome of the pilot which has also brought new external customers to LMN. The service gives LMN members a discount on the service, further savings by using a shared interconnect between LMN and ITO and an income stream to LMN. A launch event for the full service will be held in September 2004 and other MANs will be invited. In addition, LMN has learnt much that will inform future service developments and intends to disseminate information about the pilot process as well.
LeNSE
Since the last meeting, LeNSE has added four additional RPAN nominated connections: Portsmouth City Council Adult and Continuing Learning, RNIB Redhill College, Fortune Centre of Riding Therapy and the European Space Agency (Infoterra Ltd). LeNSE now has 73 RPAN connections. In general, the service remains very stable with good service level availability figures.
During this period LeNSE also added a pilot unicast IPv6 service across its core, but specifically enabled for the researchers at the University of Southampton. This was implemented across the telco's underlying MPLS infrastructure using a "6PE" technology solution. Southampton University has already expressed an interest in a IPv6 multicast service.